how to play co-op ?

If you thought Origins was disappointing, expect to be nigh on depressed with Odyssey

👍

Yes.I want to

Yes. I am portuguese too.

First, greetings and welcome to the board. Some might say council but that suggests that you do not have a choice. A choice between the glory of the Templar Order or the death cult of the Assassin ruffians. I guess in that regard, the choice is yours. Second, you earn points but having your posts liked or commented on. As a loyal fan of the glorious Templar order, I have amassed 604 points so there some intelligent Ac fans out there!.....and third, viking era game. I am sorry, I can not agree. While i am not a fan of the Assassin side of things, I do have to suggest anything that predates 330 BC and the birth of the order really can NOT be considered Assassin's Creed. AC is a series of games that supports an over riding narrative of Templar's v Assassins in a battle for the will of humanity. If you attempt to water this down or even remove it Assassins Creed really ceases to be that, Assassin's Creed. May the Father of Understanding guiding you (through this dark time of RPG themed AC)!!

I just joined as well. I'm a bit bias towards the themes of the franchise because I love all of the games personally however, I do like the idea of the Vikings and I think with the new combat and RPG style they're going with that it would really fit with the game. What I would like more than anything is to see a feudal Japan themed Assassin's Creed.

You are right,it’s a amazing game

yep whan the game will instol am up for it

hello i'm up for it if you want :)

You expect feed back?....Oh my.....With respect, they really don't a crap. So far the fan comments on Odyssey have been MOSTLY universal, it looks good but it is NOT Assassin's Creed. Some have even gone so far as to express quite a disdain for Odyssey. Me? I wouldn't go that far. Assassin's Creed as a whole has been like a visit to a decent restaurant. The first Creed was like a good quality entree then with each subsequent episode, the dishes offered have been good with the odd the offering being a little over done (Assassin's Creed: Unity). The cooks at Ubisoft corrected this with a fine steak in the form of Assassin's Creed: Syndicate. But then something happened.....Ubisoft thought if we change the plates the customers won't notice we have changed the recipe. The flavor of the Creed changed with Origins, it looked good but it really wasn't anything spectacular. Now with Odyssey, essentially what we are getting as customers is a Big Mac from McDonald's done up to look like it is high-end. If all the rumors are to be believed they are going to repeat this Big Mac recipe again moving forward into the new gen consoles.

haaaa sh ity people

What?

i think odyssey is just a game that they are using to further a certain storyline. in this, the first civilization. its no assassin's story but its still a building block for something that may come. plus this is second of three games they were planning to set in the ancient world. So maybe its meant to be an intermission. As far as the gameplay goes, I understand that they were going for a game like the witcher but the fact that they made the game really gender neutral and politically correct to appeal to a wider audience kinda compromises what old fans are used too. I would have been fine with either a male or female protagonist, but i think the story could have benefited from just having a set character in terms of gender. Honestly, I loved Origins and I liked Odyssey for what it is, but playing the AC remastered made me miss the old gameplay mechanics and the set story. The real last two AC games we got were unity and syndicate and I say that because Edward never really was an assassin rather one by association kinda acted different because of it. IDK, I'm kinda teared up over if i want the games to go back the old formula or still be an RPG like they are becoming now.

I agree that odyssey doesn't feel like a true AC game like origins, Syndicate, Unity etc. However. To me, it felt like a build up to origins. I know that origins came out before odyssey, however. Acording to historic dates and many hints about the timesetting in the game, Odyssey (I don't mean the gameplay outside of the animus, but rather the timeline you explore inside the animus) comes before Origins in the AC timeline. Origins plays more near the end of Ceaser and and Odyssey a couple of decades after the battle of 300. For those who don't know, the battle of 300 was about 480 bc while the death of Caeser was on march 15 44 bc. I haven't looked at every single historic fact supporting the dates of Odyssey, but it still shows that Odyssey happend before Origins time. And the way Alexios/Kassandra act in their lives closely resembels the ways of the Medjay from Origins. Skilled fighers, archers, craftsmen, hunters, trackers, horseback riders (or camels in origins) and their way of handeling certain hunts (like the hunt for *The early templars*) all come back in Origins (Again, I know those things have been introduced in Origins first). Since the Greek came into contact with the roman empire at one point and even made its way to Egypt (there are multible sections of Origins where you come across greek tempels, towns etc) and thus it would make sense for people like Alexios/Kassandra made their way there too, I haven't played or whatched legacy of the first hidden blade yet, so I'm sure there are a lot more hints to the true origins that odyssey pointed to. This exspierience is solly based on what I felt andd thought during my gameplay of Odyssey. Thanks for reading.