I'm honestly going to be excited for whatever comes next with Assassin's Creed! I try not to get too excited for any specific setting just because it seems like so often a setting will be "leaked" and then the game announced is not even close to the rumors. That said, Vikings does still seem unlikely to me because of how similar it may feel when looking at For Honor.

I hope they are good because the first movie was not terrible but not that grate either

Your not wrong. I admit I was sceptical when the approach of Assassin's Creed: Origin's was announced. It definitely was a departure from what had come for it but was sensible enough across the board (story wise, character wise, production wise, voice acting wise, etc etc) to be of some value. Assassin's creed: Odyssey on the other hand is a different story altogether. In all the Assassin's Creed games (and i have them all) and all the PS games I have (which is a lot considering I still own a function PS2), Odyssey is the very first game to bore me. YES.....It BORED me. The story to me seemed to me to be the result of a brain storming sessions over a few too many beers and pizza. The script was and is atrocious. (Google the history of the word 'fuck' if you disagree). The mechanics of the game where in a word plain stupid (I rest my case here with getting the power to swim under water for long periods without having to surface for air all the time carrying perpetually flaming trident and don't get me started on being able to leap from great heights without taking damage). The characters where about as dynamic as a potato and the acting was no better. It has been 8 weeks plus since I turned my PS4 Pro off and I have not been motivated to finish off Odyssey yet

I also like the old times and mechanics ind the first 5-6 games, but I think they will stay with the RPG-mechanics moving forward. But I do hope that story-wise, that they return to the assassins s templar story like in AC2 till AC3/4.

I was wondering the same thing man!

If the DLC's isn't mentioned in the discription, then they properly aren't included.

I don't think they will return to the old mechanics. Ubisoft has said that RPG is the new thing, so I think they will try to improve the new mechanics. I wil also say that the final DLC of Odyssey (not just the final episode) was a bit wierd. And also the first DLC because, as you said, it had no effect on the next DLC. At least in Origins the two DLC's was connected. Hopefully the next AC game (newest rumours has it that it takes place in the Viking era) is a proper AC game with the Templar/assassins timeline, assinations ect.

As a Templar, I welcome you to the council. We are seeking more good men for our cause. May the Father of Understanding Guide You !

As an Assassin, I also welcome you to our ~shared!~ council with the Templars, we also seek the strongest men and women to join our cause! Benvenuto my friend, and I invite you to choose your side in this great war

You logic lacks sense, but even without your attempt at a justification, how would that make sense? You'd write the same story twice, but with different names and pronouns? That's silly. This is Ubisoft's fault. There should never have been two sides of the same character. It was obvious it would lead to confusion and of course they would eventually have to choose one. But back to you. When you play other RPGs, do you also ask that your fully customized character becomes canon? No. Same thing. Actually, it's not. Alexios and Kassandra are not characters, they don't have different personalities. The only things that change are the voice, the gender and the look. Their story is the same, so they are more like avatars than they are characters. Sorry, but you'll have to deal with it.

I believe it’s players choice which is canonical. Just as it’s players choice as to who they play as.