I also like the old times and mechanics ind the first 5-6 games, but I think they will stay with the RPG-mechanics moving forward. But I do hope that story-wise, that they return to the assassins s templar story like in AC2 till AC3/4.

I was wondering the same thing man!

If the DLC's isn't mentioned in the discription, then they properly aren't included.

I don't think they will return to the old mechanics. Ubisoft has said that RPG is the new thing, so I think they will try to improve the new mechanics. I wil also say that the final DLC of Odyssey (not just the final episode) was a bit wierd. And also the first DLC because, as you said, it had no effect on the next DLC. At least in Origins the two DLC's was connected. Hopefully the next AC game (newest rumours has it that it takes place in the Viking era) is a proper AC game with the Templar/assassins timeline, assinations ect.

As a Templar, I welcome you to the council. We are seeking more good men for our cause. May the Father of Understanding Guide You !

As an Assassin, I also welcome you to our ~shared!~ council with the Templars, we also seek the strongest men and women to join our cause! Benvenuto my friend, and I invite you to choose your side in this great war

You logic lacks sense, but even without your attempt at a justification, how would that make sense? You'd write the same story twice, but with different names and pronouns? That's silly. This is Ubisoft's fault. There should never have been two sides of the same character. It was obvious it would lead to confusion and of course they would eventually have to choose one. But back to you. When you play other RPGs, do you also ask that your fully customized character becomes canon? No. Same thing. Actually, it's not. Alexios and Kassandra are not characters, they don't have different personalities. The only things that change are the voice, the gender and the look. Their story is the same, so they are more like avatars than they are characters. Sorry, but you'll have to deal with it.

I believe it’s players choice which is canonical. Just as it’s players choice as to who they play as.

HAZZAR! I no long carry the fight along. By the light of the Father of Understanding, let us begin!

Who cares! :D:D

I think Altair

I think it's Ezio because even though Altair was the first Assassin in the series Ezio has more moves and is also just shown to be a better Assassin overall. However, you could also argue that Altair was better as Ezio's best equipment when he is first introduced is Altair's sword etc. and technically speaking even right till the end Ezio followed Altair's path so I guess they are equal in some aspect. They were both great Assassins. They were both great people. They both experienced hardship when young and most of all, they were both great characters and are what made the Assassins Creed series so great today. So I guess I take it back, they are equal.

Why would I even try?

Old Ezio, yes! Young Ezio, Jacob Frye coulda whooped him.

Welcome to the Council, Assassin.

Welcome freind

I'm sorry, but don't worry. That'll change once you try the earlier games.

Never feel alone as we are fighting together.

no matter templar nor assassin, we are always working in the shadows to help

Welcome :)

Welcome fellow assassin. :)